Tax Preparer Registration May Not Be the
AnswerInternal Revenue Commissioner Doug
Shulman announced on June 4, 2009, in congressional testimony before the
House Ways and Means Oversight Committee that the
IRS plans to make recommendations by the end of the year to ensure that
tax preparers adhere to high ethical standards. At the hearing on the tax
filing season and 2010 IRS budget, Shulman said the IRS has to ensure “all
preparers are ethical, provide good service and are qualified.”
The announcement follows IRS National Taxpayer Advocate Nina E. Olson’s
recommendations to Congress over the past several years that a registration
program needs to be created for unlicensed tax return preparers.
The AICPA strongly supports the implementation of high professional
standards for tax practitioners, including the AICPA Code of Professional
Conduct and the Institute’s enforceable Statements on Standards for Tax
Services. However, the profession’s leadership is not convinced that
congressional or regulatory agency proposals calling for the regulation of
unlicensed tax practitioners will accomplish the stated objectives of
reducing errors.
“Tax preparer registration is not the answer to ensuring tax returns are
submitted correctly,” stated Barry Melancon, AICPA President and CEO. “The
IRS should first examine the common errors and work to correct those before
imposing redundant registration regulations. Congress and the IRS should
review the current
electronic return originator application process which significantly
overlaps and may even duplicate any registration process.”
The IRS announcement did not offer any specifics on what the proposals may
entail. AICPA and congressional staff and IRS officials have met to discuss
tax preparer registration in the past and will continue to do so. The IRS
indicated it will use an open and inclusive discussion process – one that
Commissioner Shulman described as “transparent.” He emphasized that the IRS
wants to “hear from the broadest possible range of stakeholders.”
"We have been monitoring this issue for several years and the AICPA will
work closely with IRS Commissioner Shulman and his staff as they move
forward,” said Melancon. “Clearly, we support the two goals of increasing
compliance and maintaining high ethical standards. We have publicly
expressed concerns about previous attempts to regulate tax preparers and we
hope the IRS will avoid the pitfalls of those past efforts."
Additionally at the hearing, Representative Xavier Becerra (D-Calif.) said
he plans to reintroduce his bill regulating unlicensed preparers. Past
legislation to regulate preparers has generally been proposed by members of
Congress as a partial response to high error rates associated with the
Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and consumer protection concerns related to
refund anticipation loans (RALs).
The IRS, however, has authority to regulate tax return preparers through the
penalty authority under current law. The Internal Revenue Code permits the
Service to assess (among others) penalties for the understatement of a
taxpayer’s liability (section 6694); the failure to furnish a copy or to
sign the return (section 6695); the promotion of abusive tax shelters and
gross valuation overstatements (section 6700); the aiding and abetting of
the understatement of tax liability (section 6701); and actions to enjoin
certain conduct by preparers or promoters (sections 7407 and 7408).
The AICPA believes the IRS already has the tools necessary to ensure
reduced-error tax returns and proper registration methods and should resist
overburdening tax preparers with redundant and potentially costly regulation
requirements.