|
Forces Shaping the Profession: The Four Ps
The CPA profession is thriving. The image of CPAs among both the American
public and business leaders remains incredibly strong. Now more than ever,
CPAs are in great demand. But a strong profession’s work is never done.
In a recent discussion with a group of state CPA society public relations
professionals, AICPA President and CEO Barry Melancon, CPA, highlighted four
forces shaping the accounting profession environment today. Dubbed the “Four
Ps,” they stand for the pipeline of accounting school graduates and
new CPAs, the patenting of tax planning strategies, private
company financial reporting and professional responsibility.
The Pipeline
One of the profession’s most pressing needs is recruiting and training
enough new CPAs to replace those reaching their retirement years. In the
next 15 years 75 percent of current AICPA members will reach or approach
retirement age. While firms across the country know all too well the
challenges of attracting talent, there is good news in this area: the number
of accounting degrees awarded increased 19 percent between 2000 and 2005,
and there was a five-fold increase in the percentage of high school and
college students planning to major in accounting.
Some credit for this improvement goes to the AICPA’s Start Here, Go Places
campaign, which for the past five years has offered high school and college
students good reasons to consider a career as a CPA. More than one million
students have logged on to the campaign’s web site,
www.startheregoplaces.com, to use interactive resources that bring to
life the excitement of being a member of our profession. The site features
dynamic tools, such as the Catch Me If You Can Forensic Accounting
Game/Contest, the Turnaround Game and the Money Means Business Online
Workshop, all of which expose 16–22-year-old students to the critical roles
CPAs play in business.
In addition, the Institute’s Minority Scholarship program is working to
improve the profession’s diversity. In 2006 it distributed 130 awards,
totaling $423,000, to students in 90 different universities. During the past
15 years, the program has awarded roughly $8 million to more than 1,600
students. (See related story on scholarships
recently awarded by the Michigan Accountancy Foundation.)
Yet the shortage of CPAs continues. While accounting firms hired 17 percent
more entry level recruits in 2006 than they did in 2005, the need for CPAs
is outstripping the supply. Another problem is that one in six CPAs left his
or her firm in 2004 — two percent more than in 2003.
To reverse this attrition, the AICPA is helping young CPAs understand the
advantages of remaining in the profession. In October 2006 the Institute
launched the Young CPA Network, which provides practical information and
professional resources — such as The Edge, a monthly e-newsletter, and a
special web page,
www.aicpa.org/YoungCPANetwork, designed specifically for
AICPA members 35 years old and younger. These activities address important
pipeline issues.
But CPAs, in firms of all sizes as well as in business, industry and
government, also play a crucial role. They can help young people learn more
about the benefits of being a CPA. At work, CPAs can implement mentorship
programs and address issues important to the new generation. To learn more,
visit www.aicpa.org and review the resources under the “Career Development
and Workplace Issues” tab on the left navigation bar.
Tax Patents
The patentability of tax strategies is a growing concern among tax
practitioners and taxpayers. In 1998, the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of
Appeals, in State Street Bank & Trust v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.,
held that business methods could be patented. Since then, 51 patents for tax
strategies have been granted and 83 patent applications for tax strategies
are pending (as of 2/28/07). The AICPA believes patents for tax strategies
undermine the integrity, fairness and administration of the tax system and
are contrary to sound public policy.
For many years the AICPA has worked closely with Congress and the tax
authorities to ensure equity and simplicity in our tax system. Likewise,
AICPA members help millions of individual taxpayers and businesses comply
with federal, state and local tax laws. This experience has guided the
Institute in considering the impact tax strategy patents would have on
taxpayers, professional tax advisers and the public interest.
The AICPA believes patents granted for tax strategies:
- limit taxpayers’ ability to fully observe Congress’s intended
interpretations of tax law;
- may cause taxpayers to pay more tax than Congress intended;
- complicate the provision of tax advice by professionals;
- hinder taxpayer compliance;
- mislead taxpayers into believing that a patented strategy is valid under
the tax law; and
- preclude tax practitioners from challenging the validity of tax strategy
patents.
The AICPA has written to the chairmen and ranking minority members of the
Senate and House finance and judiciary committees, encouraging them to
swiftly enact legislation to counteract tax strategy patents’ harmful
effects on the integrity of the tax system. In its correspondence, the AICPA
recommended that Congress either restrict the patent office from issuing
patents for tax strategies involving compliance with federal, state or local
law or pass legislation granting taxpayers and tax practitioners immunity
from patent infringement liability. CPAs can join the effort by educating
their legislators about the importance of this issue and encouraging them to
move forward with protections.
The issue of tax patents serves as a reminder that the profession will
always face legislative or regulatory challenges that impact its ability to
serve clients and employers. History has shown that once this substantive
issue is solved, another will take its place.
Private Company Financial Reporting Another force currently shaping the profession’s direction is the growing
realization that public and private companies and their constituents do not
have the same financial reporting needs. One size of reporting standards —
GAAP — does not fit companies of all sizes.
An AICPA-established task force interviewed more than 3,700 lenders,
investors, sureties, business owners, financial managers and public
accounting practitioners. While these interviewees said GAAP is highly
consistent and useful in allocating capital, they also said too many GAAP
requirements are insufficiently useful and relevant to the preparation of
private company financial reports.
To address this issue, the AICPA and the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) formed a committee last year to help FASB determine whether and
where there should be differences between existing and prospective
accounting standards for private companies. In December 2006, Judith H.
O’Dell, CPA, the principal and CFO of a family-owned real estate and
construction firm, was named chair of the committee. Under her leadership,
the committee is reaching out to all key constituents in financial reporting
to understand and deliberate on their various perspectives.
The committee represents a broad, highly experienced group of constituents
and consists of four CPA practitioners, four financial statement preparers
and four users of private company financial statements. The committee will
help the FASB continue meeting the financial reporting needs of smaller and
private businesses and those that invest in them. The first meeting was
slated for May 10-11, 2007 with subsequent meetings held quarterly. To learn
more, visit www.pcfr.org.
Grass-roots research has demonstrated the need for standards that are more
responsive to the needs of private companies. The solution may lie in new
GAAP standards or in separate, private company standards. But it’s clear
that more relevant standards would give the practitioners who serve private
companies better tools for preparing financial reports that meet the needs
of all private company constituents.
Professional Responsibility All CPAs share a growing concern over the inadequacy of average Americans’
financial literacy. The continuing decline in the public’s savings,
retirement planning and financial preparedness testify to the seriousness of
this crisis. In response, the AICPA with the support of the state CPA
societies launched the 360 Degrees of Financial Literacy effort
(www.360financialliteracy.org) in 2004.
Across the nation, CPAs have enthusiastically supported the effort,
volunteering tens of thousands of hours to help Americans get on the right
financial track. Extending the reach of the 360 program, the AICPA in 2006
established “Feed the Pig,” a public service announcement (PSA) campaign
with the Ad Council. The campaign aims to improve the financial knowledge
and savings habits of 25–34-year-old Americans and features television,
radio and PSAs and a web site,
www.feedthepig.org.
Both programs’ enormous success — made clear in media coverage and traffic
at both web sites — testifies to the CPA profession’s dedication to and
active support of the public interest. Contact the MACPA for information on
how you can get involved.
In the technical realm, the Auditing Standards Board approved eight new
standards to help auditors assess the risks of material misstatement in
financial statement audits. They are effective for audits of financial
statements for periods beginning December 15, 2006, and show auditors how to
focus on those areas where the risk of misstatement is the greatest.
The standards also make clear that the overall objective of an audit is to
provide reasonable assurance the financial statements are free of material
misstatement, and clarify the term reasonable assurance means a high,
although not absolute, level of audit assurance.
These standards as well as resources such as the Employee Benefit Audit
Quality Center, Governmental Audit Quality Center, the Center for Audit
Committee Effectiveness, the Audit Committee Toolkit and the Audit Committee
Matching System together form the cornerstone of the AICPA’s Antifraud and
Corporate Responsibility effort. All work to help CPAs enhance their skills,
perform high quality audits and protect the public interest.
Another way the AICPA serves the public interest is working to provide for a
national uniform mobility system that would allow CPAs to serve their
clients in more than one state while still protecting the state regulator’s
rights to protect the public.
With the increasing globalization of the business community, business is not
limited to geographic borders, nor should the CPAs that serve them. CPAs
often continue to be needlessly hindered from practicing in more than one
state. The AICPA and National Association of the State Boards of Accountancy
are working together to amend the Uniform Accountancy Act so that CPAs can
more easily practice across state lines and state CPA societies and state
boards of accountancies have renewed their efforts to achieve a newly
revised provision that will accomplish this goal.
The CPA Profession, Forging Ahead The Four Ps represent some of the primary forces shaping the environment in
which CPAs work today. Each underscores CPAs’ important public-interest role
as providers of guidance to clients, businesses and consumers. They also
represent opportunities. Whether through educating students about the
benefits of being a CPA, reaching out to legislators, volunteering to
improve Americans’ financial understanding or enhancing skills to better
serve clients and employers, CPAs can take part in shaping a vibrant future
for the profession so that America continues to rely on CPAs. |